BERNARD NATHANSON, MD
I am personally responsible for 75,000 abortions. This legitimizes my credentials to speak to you with some authority on the issue. I was one of the founders
of the National Association for the Repeal of the Abortion Laws (NARAL) in the United States in 1968. A truthful poll of opinion then would have found that most Americans were against
permissive abortion. Yet within five years we had convinced the US Supreme Court to issue the decision which legalizes abortion throughout America in 1973 and produced virtual abortion on
demand up to birth. How did we do this? It is important to understand the tactics involved because these tactics have been used throughout the western world, with one permutation or
another, in order to change abortion law.
The first key tactic was to capture the media
We persuaded the media that the cause of permissive abortion was a liberal enlightened,
sophisticated one. Knowing that if a true poll were taken, we would be soundly defeated, we simply fabricated the results of fictional polls.
We announced to the media that we had taken
polls and that 60 percent of Americans were in favor of permissive abortion. This is the tactic of the self-fulfilling lie. Few people care to be in the minority.
enough sympathy to sell our program of permissive abortion by fabricating the number of illegal abortions done annually in the United States. The actual figure was approaching 100,000, but
the figure we gave to the media repeatedly was 1,000,000. Repeating the big lie often enough convinces the public.
The number of women dying from illegal abortions was around 200-250
annually. The figure we constantly fed to the media was 10,000. These false figures took root in the consciousness of Americans, convincing many that we needed to crack the abortion
Another myth we fed to the public through the media was that legalizing abortion would only mean that the abortion taking place illegally would then be done legally. In fact, of
course, abortion is now being used as a primary method of birth control in the US and the actual number of abortions has increase by 1,500% since legalization.
The second key tactic was to play the Catholic card
We systematically vilified the Catholic Church and its "socially backward ideas" and picked on the Catholic hierarchy as the villain
in opposing abortion. This theme was played endlessly. we fed the media such lies as: "We all know that opposition to abortion comes from the hierarchy and not from most
Catholics" and "Polls prove time and again that most Catholics want abortion law reform". And the media drum-fired all these into the American people, persuading them that anyone opposing
permissive abortion must be under enlightened and forward-looking.
An interference of this tactic was that there were no non-Catholic groups opposing abortion. The gact that other
Christian as well as non-Christian religions were (and still are) monolithically opposed to abortion was constantly suppressed, along with pro-life atheists' opinions.
The third key
tactic was the denigration and suppression of all scientific evidence that life begins at conception
I am often asked what made me change my mind. How did I change from prominent
abortionist to pro-life advocate?
In 1973, I became director of obstetrics of a large hospital in New York City and had to set up a prenatal research unit, just as the start of a great new
technology which we are now use everyday to study the fetus in the womb. A favorite pro-abortion tactic is to insist that the definition of when life begins is impossible; that the question
is a theological or moral or philosophical one, anything but a scientific one. Foetology makes it undeniably evident that life begins at conception and requires all the protection and
safeguards that any of us enjoy.
Why, you may well ask, do some American doctors who are privy to the findings of foetology, discredit themselves by carrying out abortions? Simple
arithmetic at $300 a time, $500,000 annually, of which most goest into the pocket of the physician doing the abortion.
It is clear that permissive abortion is purposeful destruction of what is
undeniably human life. It is an impermissible act of deadly violence. One must concede that unplanned pregnancy is a wrenchingly difficult dilemma, but to look for its solution in a
deliberate act of destruction is to trash the vast resourcefulness of human ingenuity, and to surrender the public weal to the classic utilitarian answer to social problems.
scientist, I know, not believe, know that human life begins at conception
Although I am not a formal religionist, I believe with all my heart that there is a divinity of existence which
commands us to declare and final and irreversible halt to this infinitely sad and shameful crime against humanity.
[Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who once ran the largest abortion clinic in the
world and is now a leading pro-life advocate, was in Manila from February 15 to 18 for a series of speaking engagements. His visit was sponsored by the CBCP Episcopal Commission on Family
and Life, Defensores Fidei Foundation and Pro-Life Philippines Foundations.]